-
09-29-2007, 03:17 PM #1
Renter
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 3
Buyer didn't close
Hi,
I'm sending this message from Toronto, Ontario. I put my house up for sale and got several offers and got into an agreement with one of them. The full contract was signed and the buyer got his financing and home inspection done. He also put down a deposit with the real estate company.
But, on the date of closing, the buyer's lawyer asked for a week extension. My question is, is this common? What rights do I have in case the buyer doesn't close even in a week's time.
My lawyer is giving one story and the real estate agent another one. So I'm looking for neutral advice. Thanks to everyone in advance.
-
09-29-2007, 04:12 PM #2
You got several offers, so the market is good.
I'll call for closing at the contract time. If no show up, I'll ask for the deposit as buyer's default. And I'll put my property on the market again...
However, you may be a good person and say yes to everything...
-
09-30-2007, 07:08 AM #3
Without seeing the contract, its really quite hard to give an opinion.
Standard disclaimer: I'm not attorney, consult a competent attorney, blah blah
Assuming nothing unusual term-wise...
Is there a "time is of the essence" provision?
If there isn't - theres really very little you can do. Yes, you can throw a temper tantrum legally, demand a release from the contract, their deposit, etc - but the bottom line, not much would come of it IMO because all they have to do is go to the courts & demonstrate that they were diligent in their efforts and operating in good faith on the purchase. (A VERY low threshold for establishing diligence is typical in most locales.)
And realistically, all they have to do to buy a week is get a sleazy lawyer to "drag his feet" while giving the appearance of being diligent.
i.e. Day 1: Your attorney makes your demands, writes it up and sends it certified return receipt w/ signature required to the other guy's attorney.
Day 2 & Day 3: The other attorney's office receives the letter - but he's "in trial for 2 days".
Day 4: The other attorney contact's your attorney. I'll get in touch with my client and express your demands.
Day 5: I got in touch with my client. We'll be responding back to you. He writes up his clients response and sends it certified return receipt with signature required to your attorney.
Day 6: Your attorney receives it. The response is "no we wont do it."
Day 7: You close on the sale.
On the other hand, if there is a "time is of the essence" provision" - that opens up a lot of windows - anything from you potentially holding them hostage on the sale, keeping their deposit, to renegotiating the purchase price if you so desired.Last edited by Malok; 09-30-2007 at 07:19 AM.
-
09-30-2007, 10:36 AM #4
Stinks the buyer requested an extension on closing the date. I would have expected they knew there was a problem prior to that, which makes me skeptical of their motives. Honesty policy usually works best.
You may want to respond with an offer of 10 days and that if the closing does not occur, the buyers deposit is therefore liquid damages and immediate release to the seller is not subject to litigation.
You may also request additional deposit.
Don't just give the extension without something in return. even in a tough market, you must be firm without being demanding.
-
09-30-2007, 02:42 PM #5
Renter
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 3
Buyer didn't close - one more question
Thanks to everyone for their replies.
The deposit money which is kept in my agent's brokerage in trust, under what conditions do I get access to it? Will I get the full deposit or part of it? Will there be any litigation involved in accessing that money?
Thanks.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote
Bookmarks