HHI Golf Guy
05-13-2005, 12:46 PM
That G is becoming stingy when assigning PR value to links pages?
I have noticed many links pages that are only 3 clicks from the home page of a PR5 site that have PR0. I check the site structure, robots.txt, and make sure that there are no preceeding rel=nofollow tags and the site is clean. There is no nast javascript, cgi, or redirects involved.
From the site structure, these link pages should have either a PR3 or PR2.
The only common element that I have found is that when I check WHOIS, these are all new sites.
One more thing on the rel=nofollow tag - there are a TON of web sites that use this tag hoping that Google interprets the recip link to their site as a one way link. Be sure to check the HTML code of the site that you are exchanging links.
One dirty trick that I have seen is that the link sub pages (the page that your link would be on) has clean code. But the resources directory page uses rel=nofollow all sub pages where the actual recip links are placed. NASTY TRICK!
I have noticed many links pages that are only 3 clicks from the home page of a PR5 site that have PR0. I check the site structure, robots.txt, and make sure that there are no preceeding rel=nofollow tags and the site is clean. There is no nast javascript, cgi, or redirects involved.
From the site structure, these link pages should have either a PR3 or PR2.
The only common element that I have found is that when I check WHOIS, these are all new sites.
One more thing on the rel=nofollow tag - there are a TON of web sites that use this tag hoping that Google interprets the recip link to their site as a one way link. Be sure to check the HTML code of the site that you are exchanging links.
One dirty trick that I have seen is that the link sub pages (the page that your link would be on) has clean code. But the resources directory page uses rel=nofollow all sub pages where the actual recip links are placed. NASTY TRICK!